God vs. Science
Can Darwinian evolution withstand the criticisms of Christians who believe it contradicts the creation account in the Book of Genesis? There are two different strong arguments for this question, one from a scientific standpoint and from a religious standpoint. This debate predates Darwin’s position, however this issue is being promoted by scientists who are opposed to the thought of Intelligent Design. Scientists find it hard to believe that life started here accidentally. Richard Dawkins is a spokesman that wasn’t hard to find to support the scientific argument on how life started. He argues that most Americans want it all, they want they want access to MRIs and miracles. Dawkin’s states that most Americans hope that science and God are in harmony and that indeed science is of God.
Arguing the other side of this ongoing debate is Francis Collins who is seeking common ground between both sides. Collins continues to study genome and mining it for medical breakthroughs. He is also a forthright Christian who converted from atheism when he was 27. Collins believes that science is compatible with the Christian faith, while Dawkins argues that the thought of whether a supernatural creator exist is a scientific question which he answers as no.
In my personal opinion I agree with Dr. Collins, I feel that God and science should be able to reach common ground. As Collins states God’s existence cannot be completely contained within nature and is outside of science’s ability to weigh in. I don’t feel there is a person or persons that can say definitely whether there is a God and what people should believe in. Who am I to tell someone that they can or cant believe in something just because we cant see it or test it scientifically.
Both Collins And Dawkins offer great arguments depending on what you believe. However I think Collins argument is the most realistic. How can you say something or someone is not valid because you cant see them. Dawkins states that belief in miracles is contradictory to the spirit of science. Whereas Collins believes that studying the natural world is an opportunity to observe God’s creation. In conclusion why cant both sides agree that the basic account of evolution is compatible with God’s having designed it.